Sunday, January 12, 2014

Fury And Determination: Bo (An Appreciation of Ariel Sharon)

Fury And Determination:  D'var Torah for Parashat Bo
In Memory of Ariel Sharon
Rabbi Boaz D. Heilman


This message was first intended as my d’var for Parashat Bo (Exodus 10:1—13:16), dated January 4, 2014. I was thinking about God’s command to Moses, Bo ‘el Par’oh, “Come unto Pharaoh,” so different from previous commands to merely “go” to Pharaoh.  The rabbis teach that the difference is that, with the last three plagues, Moses is told to strike at the hardened inner core of the ruthless tyrant, to destroy him utterly from the inside out.

Coincidentally, January 4 was exactly the day that, eight years ago, Ariel Sharon had suffered a massive stroke.  Now, eight years later, as I set out to write this d’var, the news in Israel was all about Sharon’s quickly deteriorating health situation.  Reflecting on Sharon’s lifelong accomplishments, I couldn’t help but think of the warrior who stood up to Egypt in modern times.  In the Torah, Moses expresses fury as he stands up to Pharaoh and denounces him for his heartless cruelty.  In 1973, it was a similar fury, a similar fierce determination to survive, that saved Israel from catastrophe.  And it was Sharon who made it happen.



It was almost exactly eight years ago, on my way to Ben Gurion Airport in Tel Aviv for a flight back to the States when the news bulletin came on.  It wasn’t good.  Prime Minister Ariel Sharon had suffered a massive stroke.

For the next eight years, Sharon would exist in a coma, breathing on his own but connected to machines that did just about everything else.  Through those years, there were ups and downs, times when it seemed that he was breathing his last, and times when his open eyes seemed to communicate that something deep inside him was still alive, still kicking, still making a heroic stand.

Ariel—the lion of God—was his name, but everyone knew him as Arik, a nickname that intimated familiarity, friendship, trust.  From his earliest days, through the War of Independence of 1948 and then almost all other wars Israel had fought, you knew you could trust Arik Sharon.  His soldiers trusted and followed him; and later, when his role in the army was over, the State of Israel trusted him as its leader.  They all had good reason to.  Arik Sharon may have been heavy handed; he may have been well deserving of his other nickname, “The Bulldozer.”  Sharon always got his way, sometimes by ruthlessly rolling right over his enemies and detractors, and just as often going over the heads of his superiors.  But whether you agreed with his tactics or not, almost all Israelis today would agree that few politicians before or after Sharon have been as single-mindedly dedicated to Israel and Israel’s safety and security as he was.  

Over the next few days, and certainly into the weeks ahead, much will be written and said about Sharon, who died early this past Shabbat morning.  Among Arabs, there will be few tears shed.  A dark spot on Sharon’s record will always be Sabra and Shatila, the Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon where Christian Lebanese Phalnagists—militias armed and sanctioned by Israel—massacred hundreds of Moslem refugees.  Regardless of the reasons and circumstances of this massacre, Israel was held responsible.  In the US and elsewhere, country leaders and international bodies condemned Israel in the harshest terms.  The massacre occurred shortly before the High Holy Days in 1982, and on Yom Kippur Day, in many Jewish communities, countless rabbis gave sermons that centered on the theme of “sins of commission and sins of omission,” implying that even though Israel may not have actually participated in the killings, by turning a blind eye to the vengeful intentions of the Phalangists, the Jewish nation was still guilty by omission.  

It is a tragic fact of all wars that terrible things happen, sometimes intentionally, sometimes not.  Historian Jonathan D. Sarna, in his book When General Grant Expelled the Jews, writes, “As generals so often do, [General Ulysses S. Grant] had submerged individuals, focusing instead on armies and military objectives and categories of people.”  Sharon led the invasion of Lebanon in 1982—an invasion that was originally intended to last only a couple of weeks, but which extended to eight years.  The massacre at Sabra and Shatila cost him not only his job as Defense Minister; it also lost him the friendship and trust of his long-time ally, then-Prime Minister Menahem Begin.  (Israel’s Chief of Staff, Raphael “Raful” Eitan, also resigned in the wake of the Israeli investigation committee’s findings).  

Later, as a result of rising Arab violence against Israel, Sharon was elected to the office of Prime Minister, an office he shared with Shimon Peres (now the President of the State of Israel).  Sharon was bold and brazen in his reaction to the terrorists, first subduing the violence (using tactics that were often censured by critics, but which were nevertheless successful).  Later, however, he turned his attention to the future.  Starting work on a separation barrier between Arabs and Jews in the West Bank, Sharon was aiming for two goals:  First, to stop infiltration of Arab terrorists into Israel; and secondly, to lay the foundation for a two-state solution, with the separation barrier serving as the de-facto border.

Then, in 2005, in a move that alienated some of his staunchest supporters, many of whom had followed him with unwavering loyalty into five wars, Sharon ordered the withdrawal of all Israelis from the Gaza Strip.  The move was seen as a sign that Sharon would be willing to disengage from other Palestinian areas, as long as peace would be the ultimate result.

The Gaza Disengagement was an experiment, a balloon meant to explore whether peace in return for withdrawal was even a remote possibility.  Ariel Sharon didn’t see the calamitous results of the Disengagement.  Half a year later he suffered two massive strokes that left him comatose.  All he knew to the very end was that he had given peace the best chance he could.

For me, Arik Sharon will always be a hero.  He championed a strong Israel that would be willing and capable of standing up and defending itself against its enemies.  In 1973, three weeks into the Yom Kippur War, he saved Israel by crossing the Suez Canal with his armored division, driving deep onto Egyptian territory and encircling the entire Egyptian army.  The brilliant move ended the Egyptian aggression (and effected an almost immediate order of cease fire from the United Nations, which failed to do so for the first three weeks of the war, when the Arabs had the upper hand).  If it were not for this tactic, the result of the Yom Kippur War might have been much, much worse, possibly spelling disaster for Israel.  Sharon certainly understood the implication of the command given to Moses by God:  Bo ‘el Par’oh, “Come unto Pharaoh,”

At the same time, this fierce warrior was capable of seeing a future where Arabs and Jews would co-exist side by side and who took the first steps toward realizing this vision.  The tragedy is that his health did not allow him to carry through the dream of a strong, secure and peaceful Israel.  Sadly, the self-serving politicians who have followed Sharon—both on the Israeli and on the Arab sides—have done little to advance the cause of peace in the Middle East.


In his 1989 autobiography, Warrior, Sharon wrote, “The great question of our day is whether we, the Jewish people of Israel, can find within us the will to survive as a nation.”

That will always remain the most important question Jews should ask themselves, now no less than ever.

May Arik Sharon’s memory become a blessing and an inspiration for all future generations of Jewish Maccabees.



© 2014 by Boaz D. Heilman

No comments:

Post a Comment